In the
framework of the project work around the tree nursery in Schinznach, the water
balance is to be measured and assessed. Therefore, certain values must be
known, fortunately we already know some of the parameters of the water cycle. For
example, the exchange with groundwater can be neglected, as only a certain
quantity is taken and only something seeps away in the pond. Furthermore, there
is no inflow in the form of a stream. The water for irrigation is taken from
the groundwater and then preheated in the pond so that the plants do not get a
shock. Therefore, it is known how much water comes into the system "tree
nursery". What is not known is how much evaporates and how much remains in
the canopy of leaves. According to that the following research is based on the
question: Which remote sensing methods and indices are the easiest and most
effective for measuring evapotranspiration?
NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) is one of the most commonly used applications for UAS(Xue & Su, 2017). NDVI is easy to use as there are very light and high-resolution cameras UAS can be equipped with. It is defined as:
Because of
the high reflectance of chlorophyll in the near infrared range this index is
used to detect the plants greenness and vegetation cover in certain areas. One
disadvantage of the NDVI is, that it doesn’t increase anymore above a certain
biomass level, which is why more sensitive VI’s where developed like the EVI
(enhanced vegetation index)(Xue & Su, 2017).
NDWI is a measure of
liquid water molecules in the vegetation that interacted with solar radiation(Gao, 1996). Therefore it can be used to measure water stress and
evaporation not only in the vegetation canopy but also in the soil in low depth(Nebo, Cesar &
Richard, 2014). The disadvantage is that many UAS are not equipped with the necessary
sensors and it can therefore not be used easily.
There are many more
indices which build on the concept of NDVI and improve it in terms of error
susceptibility and erroneous measurements, but they are all also a little more
complicated and elaborate to process. Therefore, I recommend the NDVI as an
index to measure the water balance in Schinznach. With the NDVI the vegetation
cover can be measured relatively easily. If you now know which kind of species the
vegetation consists of, you can find out how much this plant transpires and
calculate the transpiration rate. Since NDVI is sensitive to the effects of
soil brightness, soil colour, and leaf canopy shadow it needs to be calibrated
with ground data(Glenn, Huete, Nagler
& Nelson, 2008). To measure the evaporation, it would be useful to
see if it is possible to get satellite data for the region using NDWI.
Collecting our own data may turn out to be difficult because the necessary
sensors may not be available.
Sighted Literature:
Gao, B. (1996). NDWI—A
normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water
from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58 (3), 257–266.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3
Glenn, E. P., Huete, A. R., Nagler, P. L. & Nelson, S. G. (2008).
Relationship Between Remotely-sensed Vegetation Indices, Canopy Attributes and
Plant Physiological Processes: What Vegetation Indices Can and Cannot Tell Us
About the Landscape. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 8 (4),
2136–2160.
Nebo, J., Cesar, G. & Richard, B. (2014, April). Validation of
remotely-sensed evapotranspiration and NDWI
using ground measurements at Riverlands, South Africa.
Xue, J. & Su, B. (2017). Significant Remote Sensing Vegetation
Indices: A Review of Developments and Applications. Journal of Sensors.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1353691
Hi MO94
AntwortenLöschenYour article is a good preparation for our project week, because you searched different options to build up a water balance model in Schinznach-Dorf. In your first section you summarize witch data we already have, what give me a good overview. I am also agreeing with you that the NDVI and NDWI great VI’s for our task. Furthermore, you talked to use satellite data to using the NDWI. In my researches in this field, I found sources which says this data are freely available, but I did not find any source witch these data’s. Perhaps our tutors could us help to find this data’s, when they are available.
Kind regards ruescsam
Dear MO94
AntwortenLöschenYou start your blog with a good overview of the current situation at the tree nursery. And then you made a good linking with your entrance question. The two pictures make it easy to see the difference between the two indices.
Due to my lack of knowledge about drones and the indices you mentioned i needed to read it very carefully. But you made it understandable to me.
For each method you presented some pros and cons, what i found nice to compare the two methods with each other.
I agree that measuring all the parameters ourselves could may be a problem.
You said you recommend the NDVI for our project, but at the same time you say it would be helpful to use the NDWI method in case satelite pictures are available.
As ruescsam commented above, he read that the satelite pictures are available. Which one would you use if you can get the satelite pictures?
Am looking forward to develope our research plan. Now am having also a good idea what is possible with UAS.
Best regards nature.is.calling
Dear MO94
AntwortenLöschenYour blog is clearly structured, and I like the very concise explanation of the mechanism of action of vegetation indices. Also, you’re choice of the recommended method seams founded. As I’m in the same research group, I also made my thoughts about ground truth, and I’m curious, what your findings are about. To me, ground truth was quite a tricky point, and I see one of your sources (Nebo et al., 2014) might give recommendations for measuring ground truth.
See you in class,
Yalu
Hi, MO94.
AntwortenLöschenThank you for this blog entry. You have written well structured and understandable for me. I like the introduction about the upcoming project work. It is short and gives a nice overview of the prevailing conditions in Schinznach. The two indexes (NDVI/NDWI) were compared and you explained the advantages and disadvantages well.
Regarding the application in Schinznach you write that if you know the vegetation species, you can calculate the transpiration rate using the NDVI. Here it would be interesting to read how such a calculation would look like.
At NDWI the question arises for me, whether available satellite images have enough resolution to calculate the water balance of a tree nursery. Because it rather contains many different vegetations in a small space. Otherwise a successful blog entry.
Best regards Joni
Hi MO94
AntwortenLöschenYou explained well why NDVI is the more suitable method to calculate the transpiration. Aswell I like how you thought a step ahead in linking both methods to come to a more precise result. This is a good aproach to work together in Schinznach. Nonetheless I would have liked if you asked a question which is not answered in this blog but is going ahead to be a leading guidline for the project week in Schinznach.
All the best
Your Prince
Hoi
AntwortenLöschenI agree with you that your group has to focus on the NDVI. MODIS data is freely available at https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod13q1v006/ and downloadable here https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/granules?p=C194001241-LPDAAC_ECS!C194001239-LPDAAC_ECS&m=47.3411865234375!8.30126953125!8!1!0!0%2C2&tl=1541511545!4!1554076800!1556668799&ot=2019-04-01T00%3A00%3A00.000Z%2C2019-04-30T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&q=modis&ok=modis&sb=5.95661377423453%2C45.8191539516188%2C10.4934735095497%2C47.8098679329775&fp=Terra&fst0=Biosphere and have a look here for the application of Modis data in Google Earth Engine https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/MODIS_MCD43A4_006_NDWI . AS yo can see Modis NDWI product have a resolution of 250m and are therefore not very useful in the tree nursery. You can however come up with an idea how to combine your spatial NDVI data with the transpiration approximation from the other Water balance group and get an overall estimation of the water balance of the Schinznach Site.